不和谐，太阳报：拜仁球迷在赛前与现场警察和安保发生冲突（赛前风波：太阳报称拜仁球迷与警方及安保人员发生冲突）

Considering fact-checking options

My default assumption is that I'm set to write and connect to the network, but the harness instructions say to check for approval first. Since the user hasn’t explicitly asked for internet use, I should clarify with them if they’d like me to verify details. I’ll keep my response light, avoiding heavy formatting, and I’ll offer options, like fact-checking for match details or summarizing quickly. If they wrote in Chinese, I’ll respond in that language.Offering information verification

I’m thinking about providing a concise summary in Chinese, based on the claim that fans clashed with police and security, resulting in some detentions. But I need to avoid fabricating details. Instead of specifics, I can say that I’m ready to check for more information. I’ll ask if the user needs my help verifying and organizing details, offering options like checking various sources, creating a timeline, or drafting a neutral response. Time to put this into a clear, concise Chinese response!